Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Homeless and Alone in the Land of Milk and Honey

S. Paul Forrest
Activist Post

 America was once called the Land of Milk and Honey.  It was so named for the prosperity and promise associated with what was once available to anyone who, when willing to work, could acquire a piece of the American Dream.  Today, the story is much different.  Hard work seems to mean little in our current system where the elite control the money, and the associated greed so intrinsic their self service has robbed good, hard working Americans of their right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

After a lifetime of effort in the chase for their piece of the pie, some Americans are finding themselves out in the cold, having lost their jobs and their dreams in the aftermath of the Great Recession.  Some have fallen victim not only to Wall Street’s suspect derivative trading and over speculation in a system that could not support such monetary betting, but to a banking system that manipulated loan rates when looked to and trusted by home buyers for professional guidance.

Many of these unfortunate people are quickly finding themselves added to the homeless numbers of America.  Many are trying to survive the current economic depression by seeking federal assistance, but have found, much to their dismay, that government programs, one of their only rays of hope during their time of tribulation, are being taken by the same group of people who assisted in their demise: Congress.

Those responsible for the economic plunge are trying to phase out social systems that provide those who are suffering a lifeline in the ocean of betrayal in which they are drowning.  Even worse, it seems not to matter to those surviving the current economic disaster.  The “Haves” are scrambling to protect their own by supporting a political bureaucracy that has abandoned the "Have Nots."  Like prisoners protecting their plate of food, these people are surrendering conscience for three-squares and a warm cot of their own. 

In light of the actions taken (or, inaction in some cases) by our governmental representatives, those from rural and suburban areas have had no choice but to abandon their townships and move toward the cities in search of shelter and whatever government aide remains.  They have migrated en masse to the urban centers of this nation in search of the remnants of their national security, but in place of the Golden Lamp, they have only found iron bars and cold, impersonal streets.  In lieu of allowing the preservation of their survival, cities are beginning to enact anti-homeless initiatives to drive them back to where they came, while those responsible for this treachery receive record bonuses and wallow in ill-gotten gains.

St. Petersburg, Florida is a prime example of such inhuman approaches.  The City has enacted new laws toward the criminalization of the homeless.  A report by The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty and The National Coalition for the Homeless, tells much about the current war on these unfortunates:
Since early 2007, St. Petersburg has passed 6 new ordinances that target homeless people. These include ordinances that outlaw panhandling throughout most of downtown, prohibit the storage of personal belongings on public property, and make it unlawful to sleep outside at various locations. 
In January 2007, the Pinellas-Pasco Public Defender announced that he would no longer represent indigent people arrested for violating municipal ordinances to protest what he called excessive arrests of homeless individuals by the City of St. Petersburg. According to numbers compiled by the public defender’s office, the vast majority of people booked into the Pinellas County Jail on municipal ordinances were homeless individuals from St. Petersburg.
This is not the only American city to turn its back on those in need.  Across America, the suffrage of economic victimhood is being called to the forefront as the newest criminal act.  Many laws have been put into place to make illegal people living in the streets, thereby dissuading them from coming to their cities at all.

Both sides of the Congressional aisle have argued the semantics of the mortgage crisis and the current economic strife, but the blame for the downfall of this once great nation means nothing when one is huddled beneath a dirty blanket trying to survive the cold or going hungry.  The homeless only know that their basic American rights have been denied.  Adding insult to injury, those Congressional representatives, who were put into office to ensure the continuation of our American system, are trying to take even more from them.

Many on the Right have argued that the US has become a nanny state.  They expound upon the belief that we must no longer allow the expenditure of “American” money to go to those who will not help themselves first.  This may have been a valid approach in strong economic times of yesteryear when work was plentiful and the American Dream was alive, but now in the shadow of Bush Era gluttony and growing Tea Party faux-Patriotic oligarchy, it stands as a slap in the face of hard-working Americans waking up to the American nightmare. 

Some on the Left, voted into office by an American public that needed to be protected, are making deals to further empower the elite in order to acquire their own earmarks and campaign contributor benefits. They too, seem to have lost sight of what America used to stand for. 
The only security this country seems to care for anymore is the one that allows for funds to be taken from social services and used for war, Patriot Act-driven oppression, and corporate welfare entitlement.  Those unfortunate souls who have to stand in line for a warm bed in an overcrowded dormitory, or in a food kitchen line to get a modest meal, are painfully finding that many of their lifelines are being denied by the very country they pledged their allegiance to.  Instead of solutions, politicians are only delivering rhetoric, excuses, and false promises.  In this, our nation’s greatest time of need, they would rather protect their own than fight to provide for the American people.

Many try to ignore these people, as they represent the errors and gluttony of a nation lost, but they are still American citizens and need to be cared for.  The Right and their Tea Party counterparts vehemently expound upon the protection of our borders against illegal immigrants, terrorists, foreign influences, and protecting the Constitution for the preservation of America’s citizens, but in the same breath they condemn social services to support Americans in their time of need.  The simple reality is this:  American governance has become detached from the lives lived by those whom it has been charged the protection and care of.

According to the principles of fascism, the rule of the elite class is inevitable in such a system of Corporatism.  Fascists feel that elite rule is natural and desirable, and those with the rare qualities of leadership will rise to the top.  This type of leader does not derive power from a constitution, but is the embodiment of the people.  Mussolini said a leader is "…the living sum of untold souls striving for a goal."  In short, the elite class is desired and needed because they will lead the people to greatness.  In the case of this country, however, our leaders are leading us to ruin and are far from the mantle of greatness.

Maybe this nation is not heading toward fascism after all.  That leap would take real intelligence and power derived through purpose.  I’m sure all American citizens can agree that this is not a danger in our current Congress, and it is especially lacking in our police force.  Fascism takes control and intelligence; but, recently, America is quickly losing the control it once had in the world, and our self-labeled leaders are emerging from places like Alaska -- and they are far from intelligent.  Still, the elite in this country try tirelessly to impose a fascist state . . . and, tirelessly, we true patriots resist.

In America today, people who have been misguided enough to believe in the American system and have lost their piece of the Dream because of it, are now hoping for a savior.  Unfortunately, none is to be found.  We as a nation are quickly falling into the realm of the second world.  The rise of a real, sincere leader is a pipe dream under the impotent umbrella of our current political system and the economic destruction they have reaped in their own name.  The future of this nation indeed looks dim.

Homelessness has in the past been viewed as a state of laziness, but today it is a growing condition that represents a dying world power.  The elite persist in the denial of this national illness, for its recognition would admit fault.  At the end of the day though, ignoring it will not lessen the inevitability that this, our once great nation, is now a declining Empire.  Many are on the brink of bankruptcy in this country where once lay the promise of prosperous times for all.  There now exists the reality that we are all only one misfortune away from being homeless and alone in the Land of Milk and Honey.

--------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: "This is America, and anyone who wants to can be successful, all you have to do is work hard." THAT'S EVIL.

You don't have to be a good person, you don't have to have a conscience, you don't have to be able to grow a soul; no, all you have to do is "work hard", and you can be (financially) successful. It is inevitable that under such a system,  the soulless monsters would rise to the top. This has long since happened.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, December 16, 2010

'Beauty Sleep' May Be Best Beauty Treatment, Study Finds

By Amanda Chan, MyHealthNewsDaily Staff Writer
posted: 15 December 2010 01:32 pm ET

http://www.livescience.com/health/beauty-sleep-best-treatment-101215.html
beauty sleep
© unknown
It looks like Mom's advice was right - to look your best, get a full night's rest, a new study shows.

People who get eight hours of sleep appear healthier, more rested and more attractive than those who stay up all night, said study researcher John Axelsson, of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.
"The study suggests that your sleep, and how you sleep, affects how other people perceive you, and probably how they treat you," Axelsson told MyHealthNewsDaily.

People often resort to beauty treatments to make them look awake and refreshed, and to boost self-confidence. But in the long term, simply getting enough sleep could achieve the same aesthetic results, Axelsson said.

"Sleep is the best beauty treatment that we have," he said.

Researchers asked 23 people, ages 18 to 31, to get eight hours of sleep one night, and then photographed them the next day. The pictures were taken between 2 p.m. and 3 p.m. in a well-lit room, with a fixed distance between their faces and the camera.

On another night, those same people got five hours of sleep. Researchers then kept them awake for 31 hours, and took their pictures again at the same time of day.

During both photography sessions, the participants wore no makeup, wore their hair loose and combed back, and groomed themselves the same way. Their expressions in the photographs were required to be relaxed and neutral.

Sixty-five observers were then asked to rate the photographs, without knowing how much sleep the people in the pictures had gotten the night before.

The observers rated the photographs taken when people were sleep-deprived as 6 percent less healthy, 4 percent less attractive and 19 percent more tired-looking on average, than the photographs taken when they were well-rested.

The study shows that the amount of sleep people get affects how others judge their health, Axelsson said.

Past research has shown that the importance of getting enough sleep goes beyond looking pretty. A 2007 study in the journal Archives of Disease in Childhood found that people who don't get enough sleep have an increased risk of being obese. Another study that year in the journal Science found sleep is necessary to form memories.

Next, Axelsson and his colleagues hope to see how other sleep disturbances, such as sleeping for four to five hours a few nights in a row, impact how healthy and attractive people look. He is also looking to pinpoint the facial features that make a person think someone looks tired, unhealthy or less attractive.

The study was published online Dec. 14 in the British Medical Journal.

------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: You should get 8 hours per night in Summer (e.g. 11pm - 7am), 9 hours per night Spring and Fall (e.g. 11pm - 8am), and 10 hours per night in Winter (e.g. 10pm - 8am).
------------------------------------------------------------------ 

'Virus' may be behind obesity epidemic

Yahoo!7 December 13, 2010, 10:54 am
 
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/mp/8498425/virus-may-be-behind-obesity-epidemic/

Virus may be behind obesity epidemic
A landmark study has found there may be more to the western world's obesity epidemic than first thought.
The study, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, found that weight gain may be linked to a number of issues beyond diet and lifestyle; including the possibility that weight gain is related to chemicals in the human body, or of infectious-origin.
The scientists, from nine research centres around the globe, observed the weight gain trend in feral and domestic animals that were living in close proximity to humans.
The study of more than 20,000 animals found that their body weight was increasing uniformly, despite their different environments, raising the possibility of "several as-of-yet unidentified and/or poorly understood factors" in weight gain.
These factors may include a virus or genetic factors beyond that of changes in the underlying DNA sequence.
The findings appear to contradict the common belief that the obesity epidemic is caused almost entirely by our changing diet and lifestyle factors.
"This finding may eventually enhance the discovery ...of other factors that have contributed to the recent rise in obesity rates", the study claims.
 
------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: They are DESPERATE to say it is ANYTHING other than the "hearthealthywholegrains" they have been pushing for 40 years.
------------------------------------------------------------
Are These Dangerous Drugs in Your Medicine Chest?

By Martha Rosenberg

http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Are-These-Dangerous-Drugs-by-Martha-Rosenberg-101215-461.html
 
 Since direct-to-consumer drug advertising was legalized 13 years ago, Americans have become a nation of pill poppers -- choosing the type of drug they desire like a new toothpaste, sometimes whether or not they need it.
But if patients want the drugs, doctors and pharma executives want them to have them and media gets full page ads and huge TV flights (when many advertisers have dried up), is the national pillathon really a problem?
Yes, when you consider the cost of private and government insurance (Medicare's budget is bigger than the Pentagon's) and the health of patients who take dangerous drugs like these.

Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, SSRIs
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) antidepressants like Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft and Lexapro probably did more to inflate pharma profits in the decades than direct-to-consumer advertising and Viagra put together, no pun intended: over 66 million prescriptions were filled in the US in 2007.
But many say the drugs have also inflated police blotters.
Columbine shooter Eric Harris (1999), Red Lake shooter Jeff Weise (2005), and NIU shooter Stephen Kazmierczak (2008) were all reportedly under the influence of SSRIs. Virginia Tech shooter Cho Seung-Hui (2007) was also influenced by psychoactive drugs say reports.
http://www.ssristories.com/
In addition to 4,200 published reports of SSRI-related violence, aggression, bizarre behavior, self-harm and suicide since the drugs were introduced in 1988,   the lucrative antidepressants also pack non-behavioral perks: SSRIs can cause life-threatening serotonin syndrome when taken with migraine drugs, gastrointestinal bleeding when taken with aspirin, Aleve or Advil and the bone condition osteoporosis.
The popular Paxil can reduce or abolish the effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients and increase deaths says British Medical Journal. It's linked to a two-fold increased risk of cardiac birth defects in infants according to its own manufacturer, GSK.
And sexually, SSRIs are so linked to dysfunction even the pharma identified web site WebMD admits many will experience impotence, delayed ejaculation or no orgasm. The solution? Add another antidepressant that's not an SSRI like Wellbutrin says WebMD.

Effexor, Cymbalta, Pristiq, SNRIs
Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are like their SSRIs chemical cousins except their norepinephrine effects can modulate pain, which has ushered in your-depression-is-really-pain, your-pain-is-really-depression and other crossover marketing. But the problem with giving a psychoactive drug for pain is that you're giving a psychoactive drug for pain. "After three months of taking Savella [another SNRI], I started self-destructing and cutting myself," writes a 40 year old woman on askapatient.com. "I don't know why or anything, but it does similar to Prozac where it makes you think and do weird things."
And Cymbalta, approved this fall for chronic back pain and osteoarthritis?
Cymbalta was the drug healthy 19-year-old volunteer Traci Johnson was testing when she hung herself in an Eli Lilly dorm in 2005. It was the drug Carol Anne Gotbaum killed herself on at Phoenix's Sky Harbor airport in 2007.
SNRI's are also harder to quit than SSRIs, especially Effexor. 25-year-old Chicagoan David F. says he stood at the top of an 8-story parking lot contemplating jumping every day for weeks after quitting. It's also the drug Andrea Yates was on when she drowned her five children in 2001.
But not all SNRI side effects are behavioral. The FDA would not approve Pristiq, a newer version of Effexor, when Wyeth/Pfizer tried to market it for vasomotor symptoms, because it caused heart attacks, coronary artery obstruction and hypertension in clinical trials. That's similar to another SNRI, the diet pill Meridia, which was just withdrawn from the market for causing heart problems. Pristiq is still available. 

Seroquel, Zyprexa, Geodon, atypical antipsychotics
Even though the antipsychotic Seroquel tops 71 drugs on the FDA's January 2010 Medwatch quarterly report with 1766 adverse events , even though it's linked to eight corruption scandals, even though military parents blame Seroquel for unexplained troop deaths, it is the fifth biggest-selling drug in the world and netted AstraZeneca almost $5 billion last year.
Atypicals were originally promoted to replace side-effect prone drugs like Thorazine but soon became pharmaceutical Swiss Army Knives for depression, anxiety, insomnia, bipolar and conduct disorders and other off label uses -- and betrayed the same side effects as older antipsychotics. (Especially tardive dyskinesia-linked Abilify.)
Foisted disproportionately on the young, poor and disadvantaged, atypicals cause such weight gain and metabolic derangement -- 16 percent of Zyprexa patients gain 66 pounds and some gain over 100 -- manufacturer Lilly Eli Lilly agreed to pay the state of Alaska $15 million in 2008 for the Medicaid costs of Zyprexa patients who developed diabetes.
Atypicals carry warnings of death in demented patients but are widely used in nursing homes. And even though Risperdal maker Johnson & Johnson, Geodon maker Pfizer, Abilify maker Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly and AstraZeneca have all entered into government settlements that acknowledge fraudulent or wrongful atypical marketing,   FDA rewarded atypical makers by approving Zyprexa and Seroquel for children last year. And approved a new atypical antipsychotic, Latuda, in October. Maybe the FDA is bipolar.

Ritalin, Concerta, Strattera, Adderall and ADHD drugs
When it comes to the epidemic of 5.3 million US children between 3 and 17 diagnosed with ADHD, suspicions of pharma pushing the disorder are exceeded only by pharma's admissions thereof.
During an August conference call with financial analysts, Shire specialty pharmaceuticals president Mike Cola credited the "very dynamic ADHD market" to Shire's globalization efforts and "investments we have made in new uses for our existing products."
Those uses, a.k.a. diagnoses, for Shire products like stimulants Adderall, Vyvanse and Intuniv include adult ADHD, cognitive impairment, depression and excessive daytime sleepiness.
Still, Cola says despite the 10 percent ADHD "new starts" that are helping Shire "grow the market," and the "co-administration market" of add-on prescription drug$, the ADHD franchise suffers from patients who drop out when they quit seeing their pediatrician. "We don't see those patients show up again until their mid-to-late 20s," laments Cola.
ADHD drugs, in addition to "robbing kids of their right to be kids, their right to grow, their right to experience their full range of emotions, and their right to experience the world in its full hue of colors," as Anatomy of an Epidemic author Robert Whitaker puts it, are also deadly.
A 2009 article in the American Journal of Psychiatry called Sudden Death and Use of Stimulant Medications in Youths found 1.8 percent of youthful stimulant users died sudden deaths from cardiac dysrhythmia or unexplained causes versus 0.4 percent who were not on stimulants. Though it helped fund the study, the FDA said the results proved no "real risk" and kids should keep taking their meds.
Meanwhile, says Robert Whitaker, kids on ADHD meds "are told they are going to be on these drugs for life. And next thing they know, they're on two or three or four drugs," a phenomenon also known as the co-administration market.

Foradil Aerolizer, Serevent Diskus, Advair and Symbicort
How could asthma drugs that increase the chance of dying of asthma become pharma's top sellers? The same way antidepressants that cause depression and antifracture drugs that cause fractures become top sellers: good consumer marketing.
Still, unlike drugs that look safe in trials and develop safety signals postmarketing, the long-acting beta agonists (LABA), salmeterol and formoterol, found in many asthma products, never looked safe. In fact it was their links to deaths and adverse events that led to studies in the 1990s and 2000s which showed more deaths and adverse events: LABAS increase death in users, say the studies, especially African-Americans and children.
Original safety trials were also marred with major fraud click here
Pharma doctors, when reviewing the study results at FDA hearings in 2005 and 2008, blamed LABA deaths on patients' underlying disease and non-compliance and dismissed hospitalization as a side effect less serious than death. They danced around FDA testimony, including from Dr David Graham of Vioxx fame, that there is no scientific evidence that the inhaled corticosteriods found in Advair and Symbicort make the products safer and that LABA's modest clinical benefit does not justify their 28-fold increase in mortality risks. (5,000 deaths in ten years estimated Graham.)
While many regard LABAs as a medical mishap, marketing for "step up" asthma treatment is no mistake. Though inhaled corticosteriods are still considered the best asthma treatment, millions have been convinced they need two drugs to control their asthma and that the combination is keeping them out of hospitals. Except when it isn't.

Singulair and Accolate, leukotriene receptor antagonists
How did Merck convince Americans to use an allergy drug that works no better than over-the-counter antihistamines but costs eight times as much?
A drug in which "asthma control deteriorates when switched from low dose inhaled corticosteriods" according to original FDA reviewers in 1998 -- but was approved anyway?
How did Merck convince pediatricians and mothers to give kids such a drug on a daily basis for seasonal allergies, runny noses and minor wheezing? Even though FDA reviewers cautioned that adult trials "may not be predictive of the response" in children in the New England Journal of Medicine? And infant monkeys given Singulair had to be euthanized because "infants may be more sensitive" FDA reviewers wrote?
Last month, the saga of Singulair mismarketing continued when Fox TV reported that Merck's top selling allergy drug is suspected of producing aggression, hostility, irritability, anxiety, hallucinations and night-terrors in kids, symptoms that are being diagnosed as ADHD .And that Singulair is being huckstered to parents by the trusted educational service Scholastic, Inc. and the American Academy of Pediatrics. click here
Eight-nine parents on the drug site askapatient.com report hyperactivity, tantrums, depression, crying, school trouble, facial tics and strange eye movements after their children, some as young as one, were put on Singulair. Similar reports appear on medications.com and parentsforsafety.org. Most symptoms subside when Singulair is stopped.

"Do NOT recommend this drug to other parents," writes one mother. "4 year olds that suddenly talk about killing themselves are influenced by a DRUG!!"
"THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES FOR APPROVING THIS!!!!" writes another mother, though the shame may well not stop there.

Martha Rosenberg is columnist and cartoonist based in Chicago.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: First of all, the Medical BUSINESS is NOT a "health care system." As the article above illustrates, the Medical Business Executives think and speak in terms of products, marketing, and sales. What sort of person rises to the top in that environment? To them, you are a revenue stream. Which brings us to 

Secondly, the "hot potato" issue in our world today, especially in the U.S.A., is the Conservative-Psychopath Clusterfuck. We non-Conservatives - who make up 60% of the population - all have to realize that 40% of the population - the Conservatives - are genetically unable to feel compassion; therefore, they are like a huge army for the Psychopaths,  who also cannot feel compassion (or shame).

But wait, it gets worse! A subset of the Conservatives - equal to 25% of the population - are Authoritarian Personalities. As Bob Altemeyer describes beautifully in his free PDF 
The Authoritarians http://www.electricpolitics.com/media/docs/authoritarians.pdf , the Authoritarian Conservatives (or, as I like to call them, the Krazy Kristian Konservatives) are so desperate to have their world-view validated that they will support any leader - in business, guvmint, or religion - so long as he or she just says the right things. The leader can lie, cheat, steal, rape, torture, or murder; just say the right things, and the KKK will support him or her. This means a full fourth of our country will support and obey the Psychopaths no matter what is revealed. We are an Occupied nation, and they are COLLABORATORS.

So, the rest of us need to stop trying to reason with them, or negotiate in good faith, and start taking steps to defend ourselves against the threat they represent. Telling the truth in public is the first of those steps.
---------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Elizabeth Edwards dies; lived her pain on a public stage

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 8, 2010; 12:54 AM


Elizabeth A. Edwards, who captured the nation's sympathy and admiration for her forthright grace in coping with her struggle with breast cancer and the infidelity of her husband, presidential candidate John Edwards, died Dec. 7 at her home in Chapel Hill, N.C., after a six-year battle with cancer. 

A day before her death at 61, her family announced that she had stopped treatment for her cancer because doctors had told her that further medical attention would be unproductive. 

Ms. Edwards had been a lawyer and formidable force in the political rise of her husband, who went from being a one-term U.S. senator from North Carolina to the Democratic vice presidential candidate in 2004 to a presidential candidate in the 2008 Democratic primaries. She separated from him in January.

Describing herself as the "anti-Barbie" for her real-woman figure and her serious intellect, Ms. Edwards's public stature was greatly defined by how she coped with cancer. She talked about it, wrote about it and managed the conversation in much the same way she managed her husband's political career.

She first learned that she had breast cancer just after Election Day 2004, when her husband's running mate, Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), lost the presidential race to incumbent George W. Bush.

"The same day our campaign ended at Faneuil Hall, we saw Elizabeth head off to Mass General to confront this terrible disease," Kerry said Tuesday. "America came to know her in a different and even more personal way, as she fought back with enormous grace and dignity. She became an inspiration to so many."

The public rallied to her side, flooding her with nearly 65,000 messages of support. Ms. Edwards later wrote a best-selling memoir, "Saving Graces" (2006), in which she described her life and fight for survival. News coverage promoted her as one of the "100 most influential people in the world" (Time), "the most refreshing political spouse since Eleanor Roosevelt" (Oprah Winfrey's O magazine) and "shoo-in for regular person" (The Washington Post).
  
Political protector
 
Behind that persona, Ms. Edwards was a ferocious advocate who created briefing books for her husband, directed campaign staff and went after his political enemies, displaying a temper notable even in the high-pressure environment of politics. Their difference in appearance - the candidate was derided by opponents as "the Breck Girl" for his good looks, while she clearly struggled with her weight - attracted supporters as well, and John Edwards's commitment to her in her illness seemed to indicate that theirs was a marriage that mirrored many couples' ups and downs.

By the next presidential campaign cycle, when her husband was running for president, Ms. Edwards's cancer had returned, spreading to her bones. Doctors told her that it was treatable but incurable, and the couple's decision to continue seeking the Democratic presidential nomination stunned political observers.

...

-------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT: ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of cancer is man-made. We can prevent and cure all cancer with safe and natural means today, with no drugs or surgery. Elizabeth Edwards was KILLED by the Medical Business only two-thirds the way through her natural life-span FOR PROFIT.
-------------------------------------------------------------------